beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.05.24 2016고단175

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

The defendant shall obtain money from the applicant C to the applicant C 495,00 won, and shall receive money from D 250.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 6, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court and completed the enforcement of the sentence on May 14, 2015.

"2016 Highest 175"

1. Fraud of taxi rates;

A. On October 2, 2015, around 18:00, the Defendant demanded the victim to take advantage of the victim’s destination while driving a F-si operated by the victim E in front of the Home P-si, U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., as if he would pay the taxi fee.

However, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay taxi charges due to the lack of money.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, had the victim operate a taxi up to 45,00,00 from Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., U.S., and did not pay 30,000 won for taxi charges, thereby obtaining pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

B. On October 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on October 22, 2015, 18:00, the Defendant: (b) on a H taxi operated by the victim G in the modern maritime distance located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; and (c) demanded the victim to take part in the destination while driving as if he would pay the taxi fee.

However, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay taxi charges due to the lack of money.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, had the victim operate the taxi to the south-dong in Changwon-si, and did not pay 100,000 won of the taxi fee, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

(c)

On November 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on November 2, 2015, around 06:00, on the long-term Dong of Daegu-gu operated by the victim I and demanded the victim to move to the destination while driving as if the victim I would pay the taxi fee.

However, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay taxi charges due to the lack of money.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and has the victim go beyond Ulsan-gu.