However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

"2013 Highest 457"

1. On May 26, 2010, the Defendant filed an application for a loan of 2 million won with a company for a loan of Hadth Capital as if he/she were in office with a company for a loan of Hadth Capital, at a place where it cannot be known from May 26, 2010, and sent the application for a loan to C.

However, in fact, the Defendant retired from C on May 24, 2010, and there was no intention or ability to repay the loan even if he did not have any specific property and received the loan from the victim.

On May 26, 2010, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received two million won as a loan from the victim to the national bank account of the Defendant.

2. On November 26, 2012, the Defendant against the victim D, posted a notice on the F of the “E” Internet game site “E sells 300 million won game money to 80,000 won.” On November 26, 2012, the Defendant said that the Defendant would give 300,000 won to the victim D who reported and contacted the notice.”

However, even if 80,000 won is remitted from the victim, the victim did not have the intent or ability to pay 300,000 won of the game money.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 80,000 won from the victim to the foreign exchange bank account of the Defendant under the pretext of the sales proceeds of game money.

3. Around 13:00 on December 15, 2012, the Defendant filed an application for the purchase of a mobile phone with the victim G located in Goyang-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si as if he would pay the mobile phone device fee from the victim G located in Goyang-si-dong-dong-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si.

However, in fact, the defendant did not pay approximately eight million won to the communications company at the time, and his mobile phone should not be admitted in the name of the defendant.