However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 30, 2016, the Defendant, at the “C cafeteria” located in Hanam-si B around 23:10, would drink Mada D and alcoholic beverages.

After the phrase “,” the victim collected the main illness, which is a dangerous object, without any reason, and gets the head of the victim E (38 tax, south) who is the back customer, one time, and suffered bodily injury, such as damage of the head part requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.

Defendant carried dangerous objects as above and inflicted injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. E statements;

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. Reports on investigation ( oral statements of witnesses);

1. Photographs photographs of respective scenes and damaged parts of the vessel;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. The punishment against the defendant shall be set within the scope of the term of punishment, and the execution of the sentence shall be postponed, by taking into account the following factors: the reason behind sentencing, degree of injury, the agreement with the victim; the suspension of qualification or more criminal records; the defendant's family environment, etc., of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (refence of the aforementioned reasons for mitigation of amount as stated above);