When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On October 31, 2013, around 18:40 on October 31, 2013, the Defendant found the victim C who opposed to reconstruction at the victim C’s residence located in the Busan Young-gu, Busan, and sought to leave from the victim.

Even though the Gu received the Gu, the Gu did not leave without justifiable reasons.

2. On November 14, 2013, at around 18:40 on November 14, 2013, the Defendant sought the place specified in paragraph (1) for the same reason as that specified in paragraph (1), and the Defendant went out from C.

Even though the Gu received the Gu, the Gu did not leave without justifiable reasons.

3. On November 19, 201, at around 09:20 on November 19, 201, the Defendant found the place specified in paragraph (1) for the same reason as that set forth in paragraph (1) and went out from the victim C.

Even though the Gu received the Gu, the Gu did not leave without justifiable reasons.

4. Around 10:40 on December 11, 2013, the Defendant sought the place specified in paragraph (1) for the same reason as that specified in paragraph (1), and the Defendant went out from the Victim C.

Even though the Gu received the Gu, the Gu did not leave without justifiable reasons.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Relevant Article 319 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;