과실치상
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On January 10, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 12:50 of the facts charged in the instant case, at the construction site of a new building located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; (b) the victim D (the age of 40) who prevented him from cutting off the locking system in the process of opening the locking the locking room in order to receive an enclosed wage for the work performed at the construction site of the building located in the said construction site; and (c) the victim D (the age of 40) who prevented him from cutting down the locking system due to negligence that did not discover the location of the locking system.
As a result, the Defendant suffered the victim’s 4-party 14-day medical treatment due to the above negligence.
2. The defendant and his defense counsel stated in the facts charged that the defendant was not guilty because the defendant was accompanied by the locking system of the entrance at the time and place as stated in the facts charged, or because the victim's fingers were not friendly.
Therefore, as to whether the defendant's negligence caused an injury to the victim, there are health care room for the victim's investigative agency and this court as evidence corresponding to the facts charged in this case, the statement of the police's statement about E, and the statement of the injury diagnosis statement.
First of all, the part of the medical examination of injury is that the victim requires two-time medical treatment in light of the fact that the victim was injured at the time of the medical examination of the doctor, and it is not a direct evidence as to the fact that the victim was injured by negligence, and the reason for the injury is also stated in the victim's unilateral statement.
Next, considering the statement of the police statement in E, E is the same in the process of the victim's restraint on the defendant's behavior.