When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 2, 2012, the Defendant was elected as the president of an association at an extraordinary general meeting held in the presence of an agent for business affairs until now.

1. The officers of an association in connection with a redevelopment project shall obtain a resolution at a general meeting, in addition to the matters prescribed in the budget, ① borrowing of funds, methods thereof, interest rate, and method of repayment.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as in the list of crimes in the attached Form, entered into a contract against the “KIKO rearrangement business entity” from July 20, 2012 to January 2, 2013, under the name of the head of the Tong C (D), which is the head of the Tong C (D), for a long-term loan for the reconstruction business without a resolution of the general meeting, to transfer the money to the bank (D) account in the name of the reconstruction association of B apartment units without a resolution of the general meeting, and (2) from April 28, 2014 to August 5, 2014, to the “E”, “FF” without a resolution of the general meeting.

2. Executive officers of a cooperative shall make public the monthly funding for the implementation of a rearrangement project and the detailed details of the funding along with the Internet and other means to make them known to its members within 15 days from the date on which the data on the details of the financing are prepared or modified;

Nevertheless, the Defendant is not open to the public from December 18, 2012 to June 16, 2016, and on June 17, 2016.

8. 25. 25. A notice was posted retroactively to B reconstruction association managed by the Defendant.

3. Where a cooperative member requests the perusal or reproduction of documents and relevant materials relating to the implementation of rearrangement projects, executives of the cooperative shall comply with such request within 15 days.

Nevertheless, on August 16, 2016, in order to protect the rights and interests of association members and to exchange opinions with union members, the complainant requested to duplicate the cell phone numbers of union members and representatives' cell phone numbers, the register including Dong and lake, and the head of the Tong which is the partnership corporation. However, the defendant did not comply with the request. ② On September 12, 2016, the complainant requested on the same ground as the complainant, but the defendant did not comply with the request.

4...