손해배상(기) 등
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The plaintiff shall bear the total costs of the lawsuit after filing the appeal.
purport, purport, and.
1. The scope of the judgment in this Court was ① in the first instance court, ① the claim for damages due to defamation caused by a false statement, ② the claim for damages due to an insulting act, and ② the court of first instance dismissed all the claims.
In this regard, the Plaintiff appealed, but before the remand, the first instance court dismissed the appeal regarding the claim, and ② ordered the payment of money by citing part of the claim.
As to this, only the Defendant appealed, and the judgment of remand reversed the part against the Defendant regarding the claim, and remanded this part of the case to the Seoul High Court.
Therefore, since the plaintiff's claim portion was already ruled against, the scope of this court's trial is limited to the claim portion reversed and remanded.
2. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 1 and 2:
As E, the Plaintiff is currently serving as a member of the F Committee and an executive secretary of the G Committee from around 2008, and the Defendant is a newspaper company that issues “D” in daily newspapers.
B. At the second G Committee meeting of the National Assembly (Extraordinary Session) held by I, as a major issue, the case related to sexual traffic was discussed, and the case was reported by his bereaved family members who committed suicide on the grounds of the coercion of drinking and sexual intercourse (hereinafter “J case”), the case where the former B BJ officers et al. received an exorbitr from the person related to his duties and received an exorbitr from the person related to his duties and received an improper statement from the Commissioner General of the National Police Agency, and the case related to this, etc.
C. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s question whether a journalist is included in the Plaintiff’s persons who were controlled by sexual traffic, and whether the Defendant’s assertion is not related to the J case, and the press organization is a considerable power agency, so the current public official’s education on the prevention of sexual traffic is also a press organization, etc.