However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On May 9, 2017, from around 22:45 to 23:15 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) was able to take a bath to customers without any particular reason; (b) the Defendant was able to take care of the victim C’s 1st underground floor in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, B from around 23:15 on the same day; (c) the Defendant was able to take care of the customers; and (d) the Defendant was able to avoid disturbance, such as taking the flabing and pushing the flab of the said victim.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

2. On May 9, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on the road in front of the “F pharmacy” located in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and on the road in front of the “F pharmacy”, the Defendant was required to return home from the head H of the police station of the Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Police Station G District, who was called by the customer upon receiving a report that the customer frights at the center, and died of the frighth.

1.2 Modern Modern Modern

“Abreging, breging, breging his fat with a bad hand, and assaulting him at the right hand of his fat, such as fladation of fat and fating his left eye once with his fat, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the handling of reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement made to H in the police statement protocol;

1. Application of each description of internal investigation report (field status, etc.), written statement, work log, investigation report (as to the superior status of the victim H), investigation report (as to the statement of the victim C), investigation report (as to the statement of the victim C), or video-related statute;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act ( Taking into account the favorable sentencing conditions among the reasons for sentencing as set forth below) of the suspended sentence (the scope of statutory penalty), one month to seven years, and one month to six months, shall interfere with the execution of official duties (the determination of type).