beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.06.25 2017가단5234432

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The Defendants are to the Plaintiff:

A. The Daejeon District Court shall have jurisdiction over the 13,766 square meters of the forest of Masan-si and the Masan-si branch office of the Daejeon District Court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 6, 1971, the registration of ownership transfer was completed with respect to the 13,766 square meters of U forest in Asia-si (hereinafter “the instant forest”) and on December 29, 1982 with respect to the 16/17 equity shares, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on December 29, 1982 on the ground of gift (joint ownership) made on December 22, 1982 by the Defendant B, F, C, D, F, H, I, K, K, L, M (Z) and N (hereinafter “the instant joint owners”).

B. Pursuant to the death on April 10, 204; X was deceased on March 1, 2012, the registration of change of ownership (hereinafter “the registration of change”) was made on the following grounds: (a) as of October 27, 2017, No. 68434 of the Daejeon District Court Branch of the Daejeon District Court on the forest of this case, the network V, the Defendant B, F, C, D, C, C, F, H, H, I, J, K, L, M, and N due to the combination of oil of the same registry office (hereinafter “the registration of change”), and as of October 27, 2017, No. 68436 of the same registry, the registration of change was made on the ground of death of Gohap, BO, Defendant B, C, C, D, E, H, M, M, M, and M, and M.

C. On November 22, 2017, the deceased’s heir, AA, AB, and AC, who is the spouse, agreed on inherited property as the Plaintiff owned with respect to the shares of V out of the instant forest. On August 27, 2018, the deceased on the ground that the deceased on August 27, 2018, the deceased P, children, Q, R, S, and T, who are the spouse, took over the lawsuit.

The forest of this case is used as a family cemetery, such as where the plaintiff and the defendants' representative graves are installed.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1, 2, and 4 (if available, including each number) or video, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 is that the Plaintiff and the Defendants jointly purchased the forest of this case for the purpose of using it as a mountain, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the sole or joint basis, with concerns over arbitrarily disposing of the forest of this case, and the instant joint owners of this case.