A. On June 8, 2015, the Plaintiff left the glass complex at home around 20:30 on June 8, 2015, and went to the emergency room of C Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) by suffering from teared injuries.

피고 병원 응급실 담당의사(성형외과 전공의)는 원고의 손가락 감각과 굴곡 운동 여부 등을 확인하고 방사선 촬영을 한 다음 건(腱, tendon) 손상과 인대 손상 가능성은 매우 떨어지고 통증에 의해 일시적으로 운동이 제한될 수 있다는 점을 설명한 다음 봉합을 하였고, 차후 소독하고 물리치료를 잘 받으면 된다고 하면서 이틀 후인 2015. 6. 10. 09:25 내원하여 성형외과에서 외래진료를 받도록 조치하였다.

B. However, on June 10, 2015, the Plaintiff visited D Council members (hereinafter referred to as D Council members) near the house (hereinafter referred to as “D Council members”) to receive treatment, and removed the D Council members on June 22, 2015.

Even after removing shots, the Plaintiff visited D Council members on July 27, 2015, in order to continue to perform pains on the right hand and to not make additional statements, and thereafter received physical treatment throughout the month of the last month until November 25 of the same year.

C. Notwithstanding continuous treatment, the Plaintiff visited the E Hospital on November 30, 2015, when the fingers were not be bended and the pain continued, the Plaintiff confirmed that the Plaintiff was in a state in which the malute was cut and the malute was saved up up to the middle of the fingers’ floor (the malute scale scalcule scale scalcule scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale).

As a result, the plaintiff has a limitation on the scope of the movement in terms of the prime and last sentence.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 2-5 evidence, Eul 1 evidence, results of physical appraisal commission, results of each medical record appraisal commission, fact inquiry, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion of the occurrence of responsibility is based on the medical negligence of the physician in charge of the emergency room of the Defendant hospital.