A. The Plaintiff and D are middle school Dongs, and the Defendants are relatives.

B. Around 06:00 on October 28, 2012, D, along with the Plaintiff, etc., put up signboards installed on the wall of the building in front of the restaurant located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul E, with drinking, G, a security guard of the building, strings the building, strings the building, and assaulted the Plaintiff, etc., and H’s chests during the same period of time.

다. 이에 원고를 포함한 D 일행과 피고들 일행 사이에 시비가 붙어 D는 피고들과 멱살잡이를 하면서 함께 넘어져 바닥을 뒹굴며 주먹질을 하고, 원고 등은 욕설을 하거나 피고들의 몸을 잡아 당기는 등 폭행하였으며, 피고 B는 원고와 말다툼을 하던 중 얼굴을 주먹으로 가격하였고, 피고 C은 피고 B와 함께 바닥을 뒹굴며 싸움을 벌이는 D 일행인 I와 J을 폭행하였다. 라.

The plaintiff suffered injury in need of medical treatment for 28 days, since two of the fluoral fluoral and the fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor

(hereinafter referred to as "the injury of this case") / [the ground for recognition] / The fact that there is no dispute, each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 7 through 18 (including virtual numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the facts of recognition of the above liability, the Defendants suffered injury to the Plaintiff by joint tort.

As such, there is a duty to compensate for damages sustained by the plaintiff.

B. However, the limitation of liability is limited, however, in light of the fact that the Defendants committed an assault against the Plaintiff D with G and H and caused the instant injury to the Plaintiff by contingency, and that the Plaintiff also took a bath or assault against the Defendants, etc., the Plaintiff is deemed to have contributed to the occurrence of the instant accident or the expansion of damage, and thus, the Defendants’ liability is limited to 70%.

3. It provides a separate explanation below the scope of damages.