If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On July 16, 2012, around 10:30 on July 16, 2012, the Defendant used the victim D(50 years of age) and Si guard as a matter of the smuggling monthly rent in Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and assaulted the victim by putting his head debt on five occasions.

2. On July 16, 2012, the Defendant, at around 15:50, visited the place specified in paragraph 1 again to the extent of monthly rent, and assaulted the victim by strokeing the victim’s head debt and strokeing the victim’s head debt.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol regarding D;

1. Each written statement of D;

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs of damaged parts, such as photographs of damaged parts, site photographs, etc., taken on DNA mobile phones;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no assault against the victim D as stated in the judgment of the defendant. Thus, the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no assault against the victim D as stated in the judgment of the defendant. In other words, the victim stated in the first statement in relation to paragraph (1) of the judgment that "the defendant was about five times the head and the top of the head" in relation to paragraph (1) of the judgment, and stated in the police investigation that "the defendant was about five times the head and the top of the head and the top of the head" in the first statement, and stated in the police investigation that "the defendant was about five times the head and the top of the head and the top of the head" and stated in paragraph (1) of the judgment that "the defendant was about where the defendant was born and the head and the head of the head of the Gu were faced with the head at the time of the police investigation." In relation to paragraph (2) of the judgment, the victim made a statement that "the victim was about two times the head and top of the police investigation."