2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 10:45 on October 20, 2015, located in the Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-dong Police Station D 3 Team of the patrol box inside the Daegu-dong Police Station D 3 Team; and (b) on October 20, 2015, in front of the above apartment settlement, “Iber was frighted with the intention of drinking illness and frighting.”

“A person who received 112 reports and tried to have the Defendant genuinely return to the site and return home, but was unable to undergo the disturbance without hearing the horses.

On the ground that the defendant was living in the above apartment, the above police officers passed ahead of the apartment house by cutting the defendant into the guard room, and the defendant was prevented from leaving the guard room by breaking the trial fee and breaking the shoulder, etc., and the above security guards "this son" was called "this son", and the defendant sent the front head part behind the left side into the hand floor one time, and the left side part of the son's head part after the left side was turned into the hand floor once.

The Defendant continued to leave the above security room around 11:00 on the same day, and re-enters the security room to the security room, putting the security guards into the security room, and putting the fright to the fright and fright to the fright, and the above fright to the police officer E.

“In the second floor of this case, violence was committed, i.e., e., e., e., e., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g., g

As a result, the defendant has prevented police officers from performing their legitimate duties in relation to the 112 reported dispatch handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the place of service;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including observation of protection and community service order;

1. The sentencing criteria shall be based on;