On November 22, 2017, the defendant of "2018 Highest 675" was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on June of the same month by obstructing the execution of official duties by the Busan District Court, and the judgment becomes final and conclusive on the 30th of the same month.

1. On December 30, 2017, around 18:00, the Defendant injured the victim’s face by drinking the shoulder of the victim D (36 years of age) that he/she intends to play a game in Busan Jung-gu, Busan, on three occasions, and the victim saw the victim’s face at the front of the amusement room in order to prevent the Defendant from escape, thereby going beyond the victim’s hair and harming the victim from leaving the victim’s body, thereby causing approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. On December 30, 2017, at around 19:45, the Defendant: (a) was escorted from the Busan Central Police Station F District of Busan Central Police Station, located in Busan Central Police Station, to the Busan Central Police Station, located in Busan Central Police Station; and (b) was escorted to the case described in paragraph (1) within the patrol vehicle located in Busan Central Police Station as the center of the same Gu; (c) on the ground that the police officer G, who was seated in the front seat of the patrol vehicle, tried to arrest and punish him/her on the ground that he/she tried to arrest him/her.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the escort of police officers.

On November 22, 2017, the defendant of "2018 High 854" was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of his/her duties for six months by obstructing the performance of official duties by the Busan District Court, and is currently under the suspension of the execution of his/her duties on the 30th of the same month.

1. On February 19, 2018, the injured Defendant suffered injury to the victim I (44 tax) for treatment days, such as: (a) 07:50 on the street in front of the site of H’s housing redevelopment project in Busan Metropolitan City, and (b) 50 men in a 50-year situation were driving away from the Defendant to drive away from the escape of the Defendant; (c) when the victim I (44 tax) was taken away from the face of the victim I (44 tax), the victim’s injury was caused; and (d) the victim was skeed, and cokeed.

2. The Defendant interferes with the performance of official duties.