When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On March 31, 2014, at around 15:55, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s real estate-related counseling services by force by neglecting three customers who visited the victim, who visited the victim, in the future of Busan, Dong-gu B building 802, to the E office in which the Defendant had worked and received money, and at the remaining place, the victim who consulted with the customer and the victim who purchased real estate transaction in consultation with the customer, “I are the E office,” while the victim is not the victim, but is not the victim, while making the customer and the victim are not the victim.

2. The Defendant causing property damage, such as the date and time as described in paragraph 1, paragraph 1, caused the disturbance, prevented the victim from leaving the office, and released it out of the entrance, and caused the entrance door door door to be set up in the entrance so that the repair cost can not be known by cutting off several entrances at that location, including “in-house and 11 criminal offenders, fiff. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;