The punishment sentenced by the court below (four years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and is in profoundly against the Defendant, and there are some circumstances to consider the circumstances leading to the instant crimes.

However, even though the defendant had had a record of having been sentenced several times of punishment due to the same theft crime, the execution of the final sentence has been completed, and the defendant has repeatedly committed a crime that intrudes upon another person's residence and steals property.

The defendant has repeatedly committed a crime of professional water law that steals property by destroying a shocked network or a crime prevention window and impairing a structure.

The defendant's damage caused by each crime was not completely recovered.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the defendant's age, family relation, criminal record relation, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act for lack of reason.