폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. 공소사실의 요지 C, D, 피고인은 2013. 10. 13. 02:00경 전주시 완산구 E에 있는 F나이트 무대 위에서 춤을 추던 중 피해자 G이 C과 부딪힌 것을 기화로 피해자 H(31세), 피해자 G(41세)과 서로 시비가 되자, C은 몸으로 피해자 H을 밀치고, 주먹으로 피해자 H의 얼굴을 1회 때려 피해자 H을 넘어지게 한 다음 발로 몸통을 수회 차고, D은 이에 가세하여 발로 피해자 H의 몸통을 수회 차고, 피해자 G의 멱살을 잡아 흔들고, 피고인은 피해자 G의 목덜미를 잡아 당겨 피해자 G을 넘어지게 하고, 피해자 H의 몸통, 머리 등을 수회 발로 찼다.
As a result, the Defendant, in collaboration with C and D, committed the injury to the victim H, such as the infection-famination, etc., and the injury to the victim G, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.
2. Determination
A. The burden of proof of criminal facts prosecuted in a criminal trial is the prosecutor, and the conviction shall be based on the evidence of probative value, which makes the judge sure that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, the defendant is suspected of guilty, even if there is no such evidence.
Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.
(See Supreme Court Decision 2002Do5662 delivered on December 24, 2002, etc.). B.
In light of the above legal principles, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the court, comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, it is difficult to readily conclude that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was inflicted an injury upon the victim H and G when jointly with C and D, and otherwise, there is no evidence to find the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of the instant case.
(1) The Defendant, from the investigative agency to this court, has terminated fighting between C, D and the victim H and G.