beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.11.02 2018고단274

사기미수등

Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. On May 2, 2006, Defendant A entered into a contract with D to purchase a purchase price of KRW 33,333 square meters out of the 1/2 equity shares owned by D among the 240,922 square meters of land C forest land in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do on May 2, 2006, and Defendant B is a certified broker who arranged the above contract.

Defendants did not comply with their commitments, even though they agreed to dispose of the above land at the price of the market while they failed to register the transfer of ownership on the ground of transfer income tax as to the above land and agreed to set the price of the above land at the market.

On June 30, 2006, using the receipt of the name of D on June 30, 2006, forged a false statement in the name of D and claimed that D pay an amount equivalent to the value of the land in the form of evidentiary documents.

A. During the period from October 2016 to December 2, 2012, the Defendants: (a) stated the personal information of D using a computer in blank as “Agreement”; and (b) sold 10,000 square meters out of the total 120,461 square meters of the forest land owned by the seller C in Taean-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do on May 2, 2006, the Defendants: (a) promised to sell 120,000 square meters out of 120,461 square meters of the forest land owned by the seller in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; (b) estimated the transfer of ownership due to the weak circumstances; (c) made the provisional registration of the said land as a collateral; and (d) made an agreement that KRW 10,000,000 per square

Provided, however, on April 22, 2010, when delay is due, the Court prepared and printed the “A Hahn” as “A Hahn.”

Afterwards, the Defendants entered the part of D’s self-written signature and seal on June 30, 2006, which was previously issued by D, “D(person) E apartment F,” which was the part of D’s self-written signature and seal on D’s receipt, and copied it in the above column of “D’s Ma-si E apartment F,” which was attached thereto.

As a result, the Defendants forged a letter of agreement in the name of D, which is a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

B. On December 2, 2016, the Defendants conspired to exercise the said investigation document at the time of publication.