Seized evidence 1 to 10 shall be confiscated.

The defendant, in collusion with his name-in-fact victims, committed a telephone financial fraud (one-time phishing) crime (one-time phishing) by deceiving victims into a false statement, such as the victim's account has been stolen for a crime committed by the victim by misrepresenting the investigation by misrepresenting the prosecutor, investigator, employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, etc., and the above name-in-fact victim acted to have the victims withdraw the money deposited in his own account or deliver the money to the Governor of the Financial Supervisory Service by borrowing the money from the victims as above, and the defendant acted to have the victims communicate the money deposited in his own account to the Financial Supervisory Service, and to have the victims receive the money from the victims as if they were the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service by frequently exchanging with the above name-in-fact victim and moving the money to an area designated by the deceased.

1. Fraud;

A. On January 18, 2019, at around 11:30 on January 18, 2019, the person who was unaware of the name of the crime committed against the victim B, called “the Seoul Central District Prosecutor is an investigator, who is the Seoul Central Prosecutor, and the public prosecutor in charge is in need of investigation. In this regard, another public prosecutor who is not in charge of the investigation is replaced by another public prosecutor who is in charge of the investigation.” In addition, it is necessary to prove that the victim misrepresented the public prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office and misrepresented the victim to “in the name of the party, there is a complaint, and that the party is not a direct crime.”

Since personal information of the party is too leaked, it is necessary to confirm whether or not the malicious code of mobile phones is installed, entry is made in the Internet search space to inform the IP address.

In addition, there is "the theft case of 2018No. 8117" when a flag is installed and connected, and the flag is a case, so it must be proved directly that it is a victim who is not a suspect.