beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.05.10 2017고정1773

예배방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

As of April 3, 2017, the Defendant is a person who was issued a personnel call at a wood company of the training of the D church and the branch of the D church.

On April 14, 2017, at the center of the D church new road located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul around 22:30, the Defendant is Madro-o, where its members reported so-called gold bars.

In addition, the facts charged in the indictment were partly corrected according to the facts obtained through the examination of evidence without any changes in the indictment to the extent that it does not disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his right to defense.

The phrase "Woo farbbbbbb and far farbb", and even though it was controlled by the broadcasting room, it was remarkably raised "Fbb" in front of the platform, thereby hindering the towing of approximately 20 minutes by avoiding the disturbance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of witness G;

1. Investigation report (Submission of evidence and revision of the date of interference with worship), CCTV video CDs;

1. A criminal investigation report (faccination ofCCTV images) [The defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that the defendant's act does not constitute obstruction of distribution since the defendant made a statement with his right to speak.]

However, according to each of the above evidence, the defendant was on the Hadro Ma

After having kn't kn't, the act was committed between the members, and then, the act was continued to be committed by the members, such as spreading the kn't of the defendant, leaving the kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn't and

Although the right to speak was commenced upon;

Even if the above act committed by the defendant constitutes an act of obstructing the worship of the members who reported towing at that place, the above argument by the defendant and the defense counsel is rejected.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 158 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.