도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Punishment of the crime
1. 도로 교통법위반( 무면허 운전) 피고인은 2017. 7. 25. 04:05 경 자동차 운전면허 없이 원주시 호저면 원 문로 599에 있는 만종 초등학교 앞 도로에서부터 원주시 이화 3길 16-2에 있는 ‘ 동아 유리 샷 시’ 앞까지 약 5.3km 구간에서 B 티 뷰론 승용차를 운전하였다.
2. On August 2017, the Defendant: (a) asked E to make a statement as if he/she driven the said vehicle in order to conceal the crime before “D” located in the Seocho-si, Seocho-si; and (b) had E make a false confession.
Therefore, on August 25, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the police officer G at the office of the Gangwon-gu Police Station F office of the Gangwon-gu Police Station F office of the Gangwon-do Police Station, which is located in 1, J.D. at the time of the commission of the crime, to the effect that “A person driving a B Tyn loan at the time of the commission of the crime,” and instigated the person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made to E and H:
1. Reporting on the arrest of the occurrence of the case, the ledger of the license, the contents of the conversation of Faceping North Korea, and reporting on the preparation of a record;
1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (timely 25);
1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 152 subparag. 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts, Articles 151(1) and 31(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for each case;
1. It is recognized that the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes do not have any history of criminal punishment except for those stated in the indictment, and that the police does not seem to have a big difficulty in confirming the driving of the Defendant despite the false statement of E.
However, each of the crimes of this case is very poor that the defendant is driving without a license during the period of suspension of execution, and it is very poor that the defendant let the police take the false number of people in order to conceal it.
In particular, the Defendant.