1. At the end of July 2008, the Defendant sent the victim B, who is the Defendant’s elementary school ship in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Sungdong-gu, the end of July, 2008, to the effect that “The Defendant has consulting companies and research institutes in Seoul, etc., and IT factories exist in Daegu. At a large amount of KRW 2.7 billion to be recovered in October of 2000. However, the Defendant left 80 million to the head of the financial division of the company in cash. However, the Defendant left the head of the financial division of the company to the head of the financial division of the company to pay in cash, and if the Defendant borrowed money from the customer, the Defendant would pay the money as collected from the customer.” As the representative director of the company called “(State)C,” the Defendant did not actually exist.

However, in fact, the defendant used the money borrowed from the victim to pay his personal debt, did not have consulting companies, research institutes, or IT factories at the time, and even if he borrowed money from the victim due to the personal debt amounting to KRW 200 million, there was no intention or ability to pay it.

As above, the Defendant deceptioned the victim B, and its deceivings KRW 10 million from the above victim, KRW 50 million from August 1, 2008, KRW 50 million from the early August 1, 200, and KRW 50 million from the above victim.

8. On November 1, 198, 100 million won was received and subsequently, the sum of KRW 160,000 was acquired.

2. On August 1, 2008, the Defendant, at an infinite place, sent the victim D, who is the principal of the Defendant’s elementary school, to the victim D, an elementary school of the Defendant, “Infinite, it has a consulting company and research institute in Seoul, and in Daegu, IT factories exist. The amount to be recovered in October every business year is KRW 2.7 billion. However, when the director of the Ministry of Finance and Economy left 80 million in cash and borrowed money to the director of the Ministry of Finance and Economy, the Defendant, who was the representative of the said company, was named as the victim as if he was the representative of the company “(State)C”, who was not actually infinited, to the effect that he was the victim.

(b).