When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant is Defendant C’s wife, and D was in an internal relationship with C.

Along with the deepening conflict with D, E, the Defendant was willing to make a false complaint to receive return of money and valuables offered by C to E.

On April 5, 2017, the Defendant drafted a false complaint to the public prosecutorial office of Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office located in the Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office at Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office at Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office at Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office at 80, Suwon District, "D found the F of this case on April 22, 2014, by threatening E to file a complaint against the crime of sexual intercourse under the pretext of marriage C, and by inducing E to pay 35 million won, such as vehicle and cash, to E on August 20, 2014." However, the above C voluntarily paid the vehicle and money to E on August 2014, and D did not have to have the said F agreed that "E would be accused of having sexual intercourse under the pretext of marriage under the pretext of marriage under this case."

Accordingly, the defendant had the above D without the purpose of having the D receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of the police against the defendant (including the parts concerning D's statement);

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A criminal investigation report (attaching documents for the public inspection of a complaint case filed);

1. Documents received for public perusal;

1. The chief of the complaint (the defendant and his defense counsel shall file a complaint with the F that D is the defendant's child, against the father of the Ethical father.

If the father is leading to the prosecution or the police, he/she is the network.

There was a statement to the purport that “I see the Agreement,” and the defendant urged an investigative agency to investigate as to the relation D and E with sufficient doubt when considering the attitude of D which delivered E’s above story, and other contents of the complaint submitted by the defendant are merely the entry of legal evaluation or the exaggeration of the circumstances, and thus, it is acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court.