2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant shared the forest land of this case in their respective shares of 10911/4061, 29750/4061.

B. On April 25, 2008, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for partition of co-owned property against the Defendant, seeking partition of the instant forest as the court 2007da11568, and was sentenced to the Plaintiff’s winning judgment. On September 10, 2009, the Plaintiff changed to the Plaintiff’s winning judgment in the appellate court. On February 25, 2010, the Plaintiff reversed and remanded the case at the appellate court on April 21, 201, and the conciliation was established in the instant court 2010Na1685 (hereinafter referred to as “relevant case conciliation”).

(c) Adjustment of related cases shall be conducted with respect to the forest land of this case, 10, 11, 74, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, or 5 in sequence, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 27, 74, 75, 76, 76, 74, 76, 76, 74, 76, 74, 75, 76, 74, 76, 75, 76, 47, 75, 76, 74, 76, 75, 76, 47, 75, 157, 157, 27, 366, 47, 47, 57, 47, 57, 265, 27, 28, 30, 343, 374, 3634

However, the Attached Forms 1 and 2, which indicate the dividing line and the dividing area, are applied mutatis mutandis to 1/600 accumulations, respectively, in the mediation of related cases, and the portion of land (hereinafter referred to as the omitted land portion, which is a part of the ship connected each of the points in sequence of Nos. 21, 22, 23, 24, and 21, which can be verified in the Attached Form (hereinafter referred to as the “the appraisal map of this case”) is not reflected, thereby realizing the dividing line and the divided area, which are determined in the mediation of related cases, on the land of this case.