beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.08.29 2013나3673

소유권이전등기

Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The instant case is remanded to the Daegu District Court within the jurisdiction of the Dong-dong.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. D’s view is E, from E to 8 years of age, and F’s self-loss is four; F’s self-loss is one of the four types; 3 South G; 4 South Korea H is a mama; 1 South son I; 2 South J descendants; and 2 South J’s descendants are currently engaging in KS.

B. I was 5 South Korea, but N in South Korea L, 2 South Korea N, 3 South N, 4 South O, and 5 South P, and L's descendants were one-time Qm and O's descendants were engaged in one-time Rm.

C. The plaintiff is a clan consisting of descendants of D 10 years old descendants. D.

Attached Form

After the real estate listed in the list Nos. 6 through 9 was assessed under the name of Y, each of the real estate listed in the list was replaced under the name of U and four other on February 28, 191. The real estate listed in Nos. 15 was assessed under the name of T and U. 4. The real estate Nos. 16 was assessed under the name of U and four other real estate, and the real estate listed in Nos. 21 through 23 was assessed under the name of AA on April 23, 1920. The transfer of ownership was registered under the name of T and U on November 26, 1929, and the transfer of ownership was registered under the name of AB and AC on September 19, 1970.

E. Each real estate Nos. 19 and 20 listed in the separate sheet was registered under the name of T and U on November 26, 1929. On December 21, 1931, the transfer of ownership was registered under the name of U and four persons.

F. As to each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through 5 and 13 through 23, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on March 1, 1940; as to each real estate listed in the Nos. 6 through 12 due to the gift on February 15, 1980; and as to each real estate, on February 15, 1980.

【Ground of recognition】 Any entry of the evidence of Nos. 1, 2, and 4-1 through 23, 5-1 through 23, and 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments without any dispute

2. Judgment on the main defense of this case

A. The summary of the defense is the sole owner of each real estate listed in the separate sheet and owned by the plaintiff clan for the recovery of ownership or with Qion, and as a preservation act, the list (1) in the name of the defendant clan with no real entity of defendant C is attached.