If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is the representative of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. in Bupyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B.

Any person shall implement a corrective order issued by the competent Si during the use of land without obtaining permission from the competent Si having jurisdiction over the land designated as a development restriction zone.

Nevertheless, from August 2010, the defendant continued to use the restaurant with the trade name "C", while operating the restaurant, which was designated as a development restriction zone, and the forest land D and E, which was parked by the customer who was parked in the restaurant, was designated as a development restriction zone, with the knowledge that it was used as a parking lot due to changes in the form and quality.

Defendant on May 7, 2013 and the same year

7.5. Not complying with the corrective order to voluntarily remove the viewing room and return to the original state on two occasions, thus violating this order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written accusation, a written statement at will of a public official, a detective photograph, a written public notice of corrective order, and a corrective order;

1. Article 32 subparagraph 2 of the Act on Special Measures for Designation and Management of Areas of Restricted Development and Article 30 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Measures for Designation and Management of Areas of Restricted Development and the Selection of Fines concerning Facts of crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;