However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On March 8, 2020, on the ground that the Defendant was living together with the victim B, who was a fird female, at around 21:50 on March 8, 2020, and the victim B, who was living together with the victim, was not living together with the victim, and was living together with the victim C in the city of Sistitu City, the Defendant invadedd the victim’s residence.

2. The Defendant damaged the victim’s property by opening the door “I have, because you have, it would have, because you would have, due to the same reasons as the date, time, place, etc. mentioned in Paragraph 1, and by walking the door door inside the house, and walking the door door on several occasions, thereby standing the door door, which is a dangerous object in the corridor, and making the door door booms down to the hallway so that the repair cost can be seen as the repair cost.

3. At around 23:30 on March 8, 2020, the Defendant visited the 1112 report of B and attempted to visit the Gaba, which was located in the Gaba, to ask questions to the above F that “at the time of departure, there was another male at the time of departure,” and to ask questions to the said F that “I would have no other male at the time of departure, and there was no obligation to notify even if there was any other male,” and then, to assault the F by attempting to take advantage of the person who was in the place, who was fested.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties, such as reporting 112 by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement F written by the police concerning the defendant's legal statement B;

1. Application of the statutes on the screen by cutting off on-site photographs, chairs photographs, CCTV images CDs;

1. Relevant Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 369(1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act shall apply to concurrent crimes;