However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 1, 2015, the Defendant damaged property by means of cutting off a fluoring 60,000 won in front of the victim’s market price owned by the victim C at the D main points operated by the victim C in Gunsan-si, Si, Gun, and Sinsan-si, without participating in a fluoring with E, at the D main points operated by the victim C.

2. The Defendant assaulted the victim in line with his father, such as the victim F (38 tax) who was a guest who flicked with a fighting with a fighting set forth in paragraph 1 and at the same time and at the same time.

3. On October 1, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, who received a report at the place specified in paragraph (1) around 23:40 on October 1, 2015, and dispatched to the police officer of the military service police station G police box belonging to the military service station G police station, whether the Defendant “doesctrine to Chewing typ,”

Chewing police kn't desire to do so, and kn't kn't h's chest with his hand, and kn't h's kn's kn's kn's kn't.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C, F, I, and H;

1. Application of simplified receipts and photographs statutes;

1. Articles 136(1), 366, and 260(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the purpose of committing the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The period of sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Suspension of Execution of the Criminal Act (hereinafter, conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing) is as follows: One crime (Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties) / [Scope of Recommendation] / [Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties] 2 of the basic area (f.g., June to one year and four months) / 1 year] / the scope of the final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple crimes in the basic area (b.i., February to October) / (g., the scope of the recommended punishment] : 6 months to 1 year and 9 months / [Determination of sentence] / there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, that there is no agreement with the victim C, and that there is any other defendant's seal.