If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 09:40 on July 7, 2018, the Defendant was unable to ask for a disturbance under the influence of alcohol by ordering alcohol and food, but it was difficult for the Defendant to avoid a disturbance for one-time time, such as taking a bath and passing a sound to find a wall for the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's legitimate operation of the restaurant by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. E statements;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) recognizes and reflects the crime by the defendant's reasons for sentencing at the latest, and the defendant agreed in an investigative agency only with the victim, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, on the other hand, there are records of being punished twice by the defendant due to the crime of obstruction of business.