Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 200.

Attached Form

same as the entry

(However, the term “suspect” is referred to as “defendants”). Summary of evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Copies of each police interrogation protocol concerning D, E, F, and G;

1. The content of each Kakao Stockholm conversation or output of a conversation;

1. A total of 40 items which output a certificate of marketing approval;

1. Details of entry and output of each new bank, and details of deposits into each Nonghyup Bank;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the evidence, photographs and outputs seized at the F residence;

1. Articles 94 (1) 8, 50 (1) (a) and 95 (1) 8, and 47 (1) (a) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act concerning criminal facts committed by Defendant B, each of the following acts: (a) Articles 97, 94 (1) 8, and 50 (1) (a) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act (a violation of the code of practice for maintaining order in the sale of drugs, etc.); (b) Articles 97, 95 (1) 8, and 47 (1) of the same Act (a violation of the code of practice for maintaining order in the sale of drugs, etc.) (a violation of the code of practice for maintaining order in the sale of drugs, etc.)

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences of crimes;

1. Selection of a fine for negligence;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse (Defendant A);