소유권말소등기
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is that of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following determination as to the Plaintiff’s assertion, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article
(1) The Plaintiff asserted that E and F, the Plaintiff, the owner of the forest land of this case, are the same and the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s forest survey document, and the Plaintiff’s forest survey document, respectively.
The following facts or circumstances acknowledged by the overall purport of the statements and arguments by Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 13 are included in the forest investigation report, namely, the name and address of the owner. The plaintiff's father's title is stated only in the forest investigation report, and it is impossible to identify the plaintiff's domicile, such as his domicile, because a copy of F, which is the plaintiff's father's address, cannot be identified. Even if F, which is the plaintiff's address, was residing in the Gyeonggi-do Pakistan-gun located in the forest investigation report on the land of this case, there is no outcome and name of F, and one's identity are not rare, and there is no data to identify the number of residents residing in the above Ri at the time of the preparation of the forest investigation report on the land of this case. The forest investigation report on the land of this case is written in the forest investigation report submitted by the plaintiff, and the name of H, the father's father, the plaintiff's father's child's child, and it is not consistent with the plaintiff's birth and satisfaction, and its credibility can not be confirmed.