However, each of the above cases against the defendants for two years from the date of the final conclusion of the judgment.

1. The Defendant and E are the victims G Co., Ltd. (the representative director H) located in the city of Si interest, who have worked as the director and the representative director in charge of the business and delivery, respectively.

The Defendant and E, based on the opportunity to supply the ethyl repact ethyl repact to the transaction partner upon receiving an order from the transaction partner, used the opportunity to deliver the ice repact ethyl repact, and conspired to take part of the goods without delivering the goods, or to take part of the goods more than the ordered quantity, and then dispose of the excess on the water and divide the profits received in half.

At around 11:30 on May 10, 2016, the Defendant and E, at the place of business of the said G G Co., Ltd., (3m, weight, 2.75km per transaction) ordered Switzerland from its business partners to load and transport them to one cargo and embezzled the amount equivalent to KRW 335,00 of the market price of the Switzerland 35,000 at KRW 120,00 for the said G Co., Ltd. to the said G Co., Ltd. at around 12:0 on the same day in the course of its business custody for the victim and at around 12:00 on the same day during the course of its business custody.

The Defendant and E, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form, disposed of the total amount of KRW 8,720,050 in the market price of the Switzerland conversion ethyl (total weight equivalent to 2,603km) in the same manner as in the course of business for the victims over 25 times from May 14, 2015 to May 10, 2016, as well as the content of the list of crimes in the attached Form B, and embezzled the amount of KRW 3,123,60 in return for the disposal to the said B, and embezzled the Switzerland conversion of the victim’s ownership by receiving the total amount of KRW 3,600 in return.

2. At around 12:00 on May 10, 2016, Defendant B purchased 335,000 won at the market price of the Switzerland lease owned by the victim G Co., Ltd., the said and E embezzled as above in the “K” in the Defendant’s operation of the JJ located in Sii-si, Sii-si, Y, as seen above, and acquired the stolen goods by paying KRW 120,000 in return, with the knowledge of the fact that it is a stolen.

The defendant as well as the attached Form.