A. The Defendant, on September 13, 2007, acquired gold KRW 57 million from E on September 13, 2007, and embezzled gold KRW 52.4 million on December 3, 2007, thereby causing damage to the network E in total by embezzlementing KRW 109,400,000.

B. After that, the Plaintiff (Appointed) and the designated parties were deceased, as the heir of the deceased, succeeded to the above damage claim against the Defendant of the deceased, F, F, and A and D, and thus, they seek payment of the above claim within the scope of each share of inheritance. 2. The judgment rendered based on confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act, the Defendant only submitted a formal objection, etc. after being served with the original copy of the payment order, and did not submit a substantive response, and the Plaintiff did not appear on the date of pleading. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion is deemed to have been led to the confession of all the Plaintiff’s assertion in accordance with Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act.