The sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable.

Judgment

Although the Defendant agreed with the victims of the instant larceny, considering various sentencing conditions, it is difficult to deem that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable, in light of the following: (a) even though the Defendant was sentenced to two years to imprisonment for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes on September 25, 2009 and completed the execution of the sentence on March 24, 201, he again committed the instant larceny of the same kind during the period of repeated crime; and (b) the Defendant had been punished several times for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving).

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.