A. On November 2018, the Defendant called to the vice president D of C Co., Ltd., a representative of the victim B (son, 1962) at a closed place, which was the victim B (son, 1962). In spite of the fact that the injured party did not use the apartment after having obtained a loan as security by the Defendant, the injured party did not use it at his own discretion. However, the Defendant was able to sit on the street on the way that the injured party lost his house because he did not pay interest on the loan as security.

The victim was accused of fraud.

Since the victim was replaced by the fraud, the victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts. The victim said that “I talk about I.S. I.S.”

B. From June 2019 to September 2019, the Defendant called the E association (hereinafter “E association”) to F, the deputy head of the Fire-Fighting Branch and Fire-Fighting Branch and Fire-Fighting Branch (hereinafter “E association”) at a non-permanent location. Notwithstanding the fact that the damaged party did not have used the apartment as security after having obtained a loan to the Defendant’s apartment, the Defendant used part of the loan without permission after having obtained a loan as security by the damaged party.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

(c)

On August 2, 2019, the Defendant was in a relationship with a victim at an insular place on August 2, 2019.

G The facts do not appear to have been used at will after the injured person received a loan under the name of the accused, but the (c) land is also used in the name of “(P) and the interest without conscience was written after deducting 14,000 and added one year for the interest without conscience.

(B) by transmitting the text message, the victim’s reputation was undermined by openly pointing out false facts.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and examined by the court below, the facts charged in the instant case are proven beyond a reasonable doubt only by the evidence submitted by the prosecutor.

It is insufficient to view it, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

A. Crimes No. 1 of the facts charged