[손해배상][집17(1)민,015]
Since one's own land is used as a road without due process and its ownership is not lost, it is not possible to claim damages equivalent to the market price on the ground of the loss of ownership.
Since the land owned by the owner is used as a road without due process and its ownership is lost, it is not possible to claim damages equivalent to the market price on the ground of the loss of ownership.
Article 750 of the Civil Act
Plaintiff
Seoul Metropolitan Government
Seoul High Court Decision 67Na2557 delivered on January 12, 1968, Seoul High Court Decision 67Na2557 delivered on January 12, 1968
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
The grounds for appeal by the Plaintiff’s attorney are determined.
According to the original judgment, the court below acknowledged the fact that the defendant has completed construction work which is incorporated into a road without legitimate procedure and used illegally in the general public, and held that it is unfair to claim compensation for damages equivalent to the market price, i.e., exchange value for the reason that the right to use is not known, and that it is impossible to return the land. The conclusion that the original judgment clearly determines whether the above land is impossible to return or not, but that the above land is not impossible to return, and that the defendant is not entitled to full compensation for damages because it is not equivalent to the above land's market price because it can not be seen that the defendant's right to use the land was lost for the reason that it can not be returned completely because it can not be seen that the right to use the land can not be returned for the reason that it can not be restored completely because it can not be seen that the defendant's right to use the land can not be returned for the reason that it can not be seen that the right to use the land can not be returned.
Therefore, this appeal is dismissed by the assent of all participating judges, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Supreme Court Judge Ma-dong (Presiding Judge) Ma-dong (Presiding Judge)