(a) the District Court for the District Court with respect to the real estate in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Schedule in Schedule 1;

(a) Details of the land survey report;

B. The real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 attached to the registration of ownership preservation in the name of the defendant (hereinafter “each land of this case”) is above A.

The registration of preservation of ownership in the name of the defendant was made separately by dividing it from the land specified in the paragraph.

C. Inheritance Relations (1) A, the father of Q, who was the father of Q, who had his permanent domicile in the Seoul Central District P, died prior to Australia J, and the J died on January 1, 1931, and Q Q, the son of D, succeeded to Australia.

(2) Q died on October 21, 1959, and R, South Q, died on March 1, 1951, and the next South, South, Australia succeeded to Australia.

(3) S died on August 16, 1998, and the plaintiff is the head of S.

On October 1, 1910, 1910, the old Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Twit-gu, marked as Masung, V on April 1, 1914.

[Ground of recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence 1 to 27 (including each number), the fact-finding results on W of Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination:

A. According to the facts based on the validity of registration of preservation of ownership, each of the instant lands is owned by J and D, a land survey book, and the presumption of registration of preservation of ownership in each of the instant lands was broken, and barring any special circumstance, each of the registrations of preservation of ownership in the Defendant’s name is null and void.

B. (1) On October 1, 1910, in the area of Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, the identity of the Line, U.S., the point indicated as V on April 1, 1914, D on the Land Survey Division, and J.