However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On December 24, 2019, around 00:10 on December 24, 2019, the Defendant insultingd the victim E, who is a police officer belonging to the Daegu Suwon Police Station D District, who received 112 report and called the victim E, in the event of a traffic accident that conflict with another taxi, and received the 112 report, and told the victim E, a police officer belonging to the Daegu Seosung Police Station D District, who called the victim, to “to open, Chewing,” without any justifiable reason, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 report by assaulting the victim E’s face twice.

2. In a temporary and at a place under the above 1.1., the Defendant publicly insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim by having the victim F, who is a person in charge of the handling of a taxi accident, such as the victim’s horse, dispatched police officers, and taxi drivers, etc., as “I can do so, she can do so, she can do so, and she can do so, but she should do so.”

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendant’s partial statement E, F’s legal statement E, F’s statement E, F, and G’s police statement statement, investigation report(F phone statement for reference) on the statement of statement, the Defendant and his defense counsel in the 112 Report Handling Table asserted that the Defendant denies the charge since he did not take a bath or spite, but considering the fact that E and F’s statement present as witness is consistent and specific from the beginning, and that there is no reason to dismiss the Defendant, the content of the testimony is credibility.

F or G’s statement, which is a police officer dispatched to the site, was not expressed by the defendant to the victims.

In view of the fact that a statement that he or she did not spit or spit, but failed to do so, the statement is not inconsistent with the above witness’s statement, taking into account the fact that the person who made the statement was engaged in traffic safety guidance or vehicle movement at the time, so that it may not be seen.