However, as to the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendants are above.

Defendant

A is the full-time employee, and Defendant B is the age club employee.

The Defendants received a proposal from E running a telephone financial fraud company to pay 5% of the withdrawal amount under the daily name of the week when withdrawing the amount of damage from telephone financial fraud, and had been aware of the fact that E carries out cash withdrawal on behalf of the telephone financial fraud companies operated by E, etc., and had been willing to participate in the fraud crime of F, etc. in collusion with E, G, H, F, and its employees in sequence.

Around December 2, 2011, F, who operates a telephone financial fraud company according to such prior invitation, sent text messages, such as “IBK IB K I head of IB I. Ma (30,000 won ....... 170,000 won per month .... ..... 200 won ....... ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .... ....) to the victim J of the telephone financial fraud operated by F, by means of the telephone financial fraud company, introduced itself as an employee of the trustee bank of the bank, to arrange for the loan to the victim. ... .. ... ... ... ... 200 . .. .. .. .. 15 . 201 . . . . . . . . . .. . . ... . . .... ..... . . . .. . . .. . . ....... . .... .... . ..... . ..... . . . . . . .... . ..........

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with E, G, H, F and their employees in sequence.