beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2016.01.29 2015고단864

사기

Text

Defendant

A The crime of section 854 of the order of 2015 and section 1 to 4 of the annexed crime list in Section 2.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On May 28, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months of imprisonment for fraud in the Daegu District Court Port Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court on April 28, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 5, 2015.

[Criminal facts] 2015 Highest 864

1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint crime committed in collusion with the Defendants to sell an item duly acquired by hacking without authority in the (ju) MM game’s age online, and to connect the victim G with the “F” server on the (ju) EP online in North Korea-gu at the port of port of port on February 26, 2015, by linking the victim with the “F” “T” server in the (ju) EPC server located in North Korea-gu at the port of port of port of port on February 26, 2015, and selling the item (32 pages of life, 32 Gab’s life, Gab’s rab, 2, Gai B, Gai B, Gai B, Gai B, and 3).

was made.

However, the above item is an item arbitrarily transferred by using the password that the defendants came to know upon delegation of the management of the account from H by the original owner. Therefore, the defendants did not have the intent or ability to sell the above item.

The Defendants received the total sum of KRW 1,750,000, around 02:13:00,000 and KRW 750,000,00 on the same day from the victims of the Saemaul Bank in the name of the Defendant B in the name of the purchase price, from the victims of the purchase price.

2. On April 15, 2015, Defendant A posted a letter stating that a smartphone 3 would sell gallone in a middle lux of the Korean polyx 3 university, located in Gangseo-si, Gangnam-si, and that, in fact, Defendant A would send the purchase price to the door-to-door store by accessing the middle lux of the smartphone Stockholm, and that, in fact, the victim J expressed that “the remittance of the purchase price would result in the transfer of the goods.”

However, as the defendant did not own three gallons, the defendant did not have intention or ability to sell three gallons to the victim.

The Defendant, as a member of the Defendant, purchased money from the injured party on April 16, 2015.