However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 3, 2012, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the port branch of the Daegu District Court on September 3, 2012, and on January 22, 2014, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime, and on April 23, 2014, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 6 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving).

On January 13, 2015, at around 02:25, the Defendant driven a B-fol-bol car with approximately 50 meters alcohol concentration of 0.115% under the influence of alcohol without a car driver’s license from the front side of the B-fol-bol-dong, B-fol-do, the front side of the B-fol-do, the front side of which is located in the T-gol street of the north-gu, B-gol-do to the front side of the two-gol-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the control results of drinking driving, statement of the state of drinking drivers, and inquiry about the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Inquiry into the enemy;

1. Previous records: Application of inquiries, such as criminal records, and criminal investigation reports (report accompanied by a summary order issued on the same type of power);

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for ordinary concurrent crimes (the punishment imposed for a violation of the Road Traffic Act heavier than that of a punishment);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, such as probation, community service order, and order to attend a lecture, is that the defendant was punished several times for drunk driving, and that he was driving under a license without a license, etc., is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, the fact that there is no criminal record exceeding the fine against the accused, that the accused is going against the wrong, and that he/she will not drive under the influence of alcohol again in the future, and that he/she is also the accused.