On May 26, 2014, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of a fine of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daejeon District Court. On August 8, 2016, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Chungcheong District Court, and on September 21, 2017, sentenced seven months to imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the Daejeon District Court on September 28, 2017, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Daejeon Prison on December 28, 2017.

On the other hand, on December 20, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment for the obstruction of performance of official duties by the Daejeon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 22, 2020.

1. Around 09:00 on November 7, 2019, the Defendant driven a drank car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 100 meters without obtaining a driver’s license from the front of a restaurant where the trade name of the Daejeon Pungdong is unknown to the front of the C convenience store located in Daejeon Pung-gu B, and without obtaining a driver’s license.

As a result, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving without a license and violated the prohibition of driving without a license more than twice.

2. The Defendant was divingd in the car while driving under influence of alcohol at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph (1) at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph (1) and notified the Defendant of his personal information in order to avoid punishment for a person who is requested to identify himself/herself by the staff F of the Daejeon Police Station E zone belonging to the Daejeon Police Station E zone called the Daejeon Police Station, and notified him/her of his/her personal information, and then written “G” in the driver’s statement column of the report on the circumstantial statement of the Jeju Drivers, and submitted the said report to the said F who is aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged another person's signature for the purpose of exercising his/her right, and submitted a forged signature as mentioned above to the same effect.