beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.11 2013고단526

강제추행

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a public official in charge of parking management in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office and a local contract official belonging to the D Team, and the victim E (V, 45) is a job partner belonging to the said D Team.

1. On May 10, 2012, the Defendant, on May 10, 2012, committed an indecent act by force against the victim, on the part of the F stopping Control Vehicle that was moving to the 225rd-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, on the part of the Defendant, proposed that the victim “on the part of the head of the Gu’s park,” was rejected, and thus, “on the part of the head of the Gu’s official commendation that he would do so.”

2. On May 20, 2012, at around 12:51, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim in a manner close to the victim’s chests, i.e., the victim, who was seated in the front direction and exchanged with the staff of the call center of Gangnam-gu Urban Management Corporation, and was under business instructions, on the top of the victim’s chests, while he was under business instructions, on two occasions. The victim’s sound called “ma in the body.” The Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim by force, as near as the victim’s fingers and bucks, the Defendant fucks away to the left side of the victim’s chests.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged through each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the evidence alone submitted by the Prosecutor alone is insufficient to deem that the facts charged are sufficiently proven to the extent that it excludes a reasonable doubt, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

With regard to Paragraph 1 of the facts charged, it is difficult for the defendant to easily understand that the chest part of the victim himself/herself was in dispute with the victim because he/she had different opinions with regard to the method of regulating and regulating areas, in view of the character and conduct of the defendant who was in dispute with the victim, and the situation is the victim.