A. In fact, the Defendant, on the day of the instant case, did not interfere with the victim D’s C Center’s operation by making the Defendant sited in front of the Ethical education room to communicate with E on the day of the instant case.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (an amount of KRW 700,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court, based on the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, obstructed the victim’s C Center operations for about one hour, such as: (a) the victim D, a person in charge of the operation of C Center, committed a disturbance, such as committing the Defendant from the investigative agency to the outside, etc.; and (b) the customers who were in the C Center, who were in the C Center, committed the disturbance by the Defendant at the investigative agency.

G, who is an employee of the C Center, has failed to meet the victim's statement, such as she committed a disturbance to the police officer's clothes, etc. consistently at the investigative agency and the original trial, by consistently committing the crimes committed by the Defendant at the police officer, etc., which led to the Defendant's contact with him and the Defendant's wife, and the Defendant's wife was committed. He continued to go from the investigation agency, which is a police officer called upon the Defendant's report, even though he continued to go on in the corridor where the Defendant was sent to the Defendant, it would interfere with the Defendant's business, but she was arrested as the current offender of the crime of interference with his duties. According to the C Center's video-recording video-recording and photograph, etc., he is consistent with the victim's statement. According to the C Center's video-recording video-recording and photograph, etc., the Defendant entered the door above the C Center pursuant to E in many kinds of clothes of people, cut out the locked door, and brought about the chair in the Ka.

Along with the fact that the police officer can be checked to enter a room in E, and the witness L at the same time can be seen as avoiding disturbance, such as committing the Defendant.