When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 16, 2016, the Defendant was a person working for the Deputy Commissioner of Suwon-si Office (State) DD in Suwon-si Co., Ltd. as an employee, and was first aware of the victim E (39 tax) who had been working for the Deputy Commissioner of Suwon-si.

At around 22:20 on the same day, the Defendant, in front of the “G cafeteria” in Suwon-si F, was under the influence of alcohol on the part of the victim, and was under the influence of alcohol while on the part of the H rocketing taxi vehicle, and was under the influence of alcohol with the victim, and was under the influence of alcohol, and the victim’s face and body body were under the influence of alcohol, and the victim’s face and body were under the influence of alcohol, and the victim’s face and body were under the influence of alcohol, and the victim was under the influence of alcohol, and was under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the site and suspect E-mail photographs;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant would not repeat the crime of this case against the depth of the crime of this case and would have committed the crime of this case by contingently at the end of the dispute with the victim while under the influence of a certain degree. The crime of this case appears to have been actively endeavored for recovery of damage caused by the victim, such as payment of medical expenses to the victim immediately after the crime of this case, and the fact that the victim would be deemed to have suffered a relatively serious injury due to the crime of this case by smoothly agreement with the victim, and the defendant was punished by a fine for the same kind of crime.