The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 31,509,618 and its interest on March 3, 2015.

A. The Defendant and C’s previous lease relationship 1) around October 2004: (a) leased C the residential part among the third floor of the building of Gangseo-si and the F ground; and (b) thereafter leased C the second floor of the above building and the second floor of the art education institute, and the above building underground. (c) On March 31, 2005, after the Defendant leased the part of the above Habem Institute from the Defendant, C completed the report of the regional child center with “30 children’s center, private company, and private company’s accommodation (30 or more children’s center and private company’s accommodation)” to the Plaintiff; and (d) thereafter, C operated the local child center with the name of “B” from the above-mentioned building and the above-mentioned building under the name of “B children’s center.”

B. On February 25, 2009, in order to resolve the financial burden of the monthly payment of the local children's centers within the jurisdiction, the Plaintiff was seeking to establish a "plan to provide the fund for the fund for the fund for the fund for the fund for the lease on a deposit basis. The main contents of the plan to provide the fund for the fund for the lease on a deposit basis are as follows: When concluding a contract for the fund for the fund for the lease on a deposit basis with private capital - the time to ascertain whether there is any defect in the stability and safety in selecting the building owner and the fund for the fund for the lease on a deposit basis under the name of the building owner in the name of the Gangseoungung market at the time of signing the contract for the fund for the fund for the fund for the lease on a deposit basis: The operating method between February 2009 and May 209; in principle, the period of the fund for the fund for the lease on a deposit basis shall be two years from the date of entering into the contract for the fund for the fund for the fund; and C, around March 2009.

C. According to the decision of the Plaintiff’s 1st lease agreement with the original Defendant and C on the grant of the lease fund to the local child center B.