The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, the lower court’s determination that the instant conjunctive charge was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience and the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “purposes to defend” in the crime of violating the Act on Promotion of Information

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.