When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The specific attitude of theft was modified differently from the facts charged to the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's right of defense.

The Defendant is a space between the victim B (n, 18 years of age) of German nationality and the Defendant’s knowledge with the words “inward”.

On May 6, 2019, the Defendant, around 23:20 on May 6, 2019,: (a) committed a theft by means of taking the victim out of the house and preventing the victim from returning back to the house when the victim, including money 50,00 won, passport, wall, credit card, earphone, earphone, and auxiliary distribution, which the victim had at the time of visiting the house of the Defendant of Suwon-gu, Busan.

Summary of Evidence

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. B written statements;

1. The victim's report (thief), investigation report (the identity of the suspect), investigation report (CCTV image and photograph attached) [1] The victim's statement appears to have not been exaggeratedly stated in the victim's statement. If it appears to be clear that the victim's statement can be trusted in trust by specific and natural methods, and it is possible not only to exclude the victim's possession, but also by indirect means, and it is possible to exclude the defendant from possession in a manner that prevents the defendant from taking the victim out and leaving the house, such as the case in this case, ② the contents of the victim's CCTV and the statement sent to the defendant, the victim's statement (the victim's statement was made only after the victim got out of the restaurant). < Amended by Act No. 1000, Mar. 1, 2007>