매매대금반환
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court which cited the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is amended and added as set forth in
(1) In light of the evidence submitted by the plaintiff and all the circumstances revealed in the records and hearings of this case, the fact-finding and determination of the first instance court is justifiable, and there is no error as alleged in the grounds for appeal by the plaintiff). 2. 4. Correction and additions 8 and 9 (No error as alleged in the grounds for appeal by the plaintiff) added 5). In addition, the defendant A, other than the defendant A, also filed 12 purchase applications through the brokerage office described in paragraph (2). However, even though more than half of them were not appropriate and they did not reach the conclusion of the sales contract, the "the fact-finding" of Section 10 of Part 7 of the "No. 10 of the "No. 7 of the "No. 12" was corrected as follows. "The plaintiff's expertise and expertise on the part of the plaintiff, and the non-professional nature of the defendant, including the defendants' request for purchase, did not make a majority of real estate purchase application processed by the brokerage office, and the plaintiff did not proceed with the purchase application of this case."
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the appeal against the Defendants by the Plaintiff is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.