However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 07:10 on August 8, 2015, the Defendant: (a) in front of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and (b) in front of the Defendant, the police officers D and E, belonging to the Seoul Mine Police Station Police Station Police Station, who was called out after receiving 112 reports on the Defendant’s her former female her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the F, G, E, and D;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that there is an error and the result of damage are not relatively heavy);

1. Probation, community service order, the proviso to Article 62-2 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;